Let me begin by saying that I am what you would call a "fan" of Regina; not a "superfan": I don't have any T-shirts or dolls made from her hair or anything, just one poster that Erika got for free the other day and it's not even on the wall yet. I'm not even a fan from the beginning: I got into her third album first and had to backtrack. I eagerly anticipated Begin to Hope and compromised my opinions a little when the arrangements had more than three instruments. I defended her when her indie fans said the shit that other indie kids always get off to: "it's overproduced," or "I liked her early stuff the best," or "it's too catchy."
That said, I'm not sure how to feel about Far. I've been too out of the loop to realize she was releasing another album, which may have played in her favor: I had nothing to anticipate; no expectations. I ended up feeling confused while listening to it for the first time this morning. I like it, but I don't love it yet. I wonder if I ever will. I can easily anticipate the criticisms of others and just as easily refute them:
1. It is heavily produced.
This is merely a fact and not a valid criticism.
2. It sounds like a significant departure from the style that her "true" fans enjoy so much.
However, it fits into a logical progression. If your first three albums garner enough respect and street-credibility among indie fans and fellow musicians, you will release a fourth and it will include a greater attention to detail in production. If that one opens you up to a wider market and twelve-year-old girls love your singles and can watch your videos on MTV, and you make a ton of money, why would you return to a style that would surely diminish your potential in a mainstream market with your fifth major release?
3. "Laughing With" - Comes across as a little "preachy."
So could "Samson," and "Chemo-Limo." Why does it sound like a lecture? Is it because Regina's so quirky and cute that serious themes just throw us off? Is it because some of her collegiate hipster fans are smart enough to doubt things like God and religion and nothing pisses us ultra-liberals off more than when someone as smart and weird and interesting as we are believes strongly in something so illogical as God and likes something so mainstream as religion?
4. Her "new" stuff seems forced. Quirky loses its novelty after five albums.
Almost half the songs on this album are old. "Blue Lips," "Folding Chair," "Dance Anthem of the 80's," "Genius next Door," "Human of the Year," and "Wallet" all predate the release of Begin to Hope (some of them even predate Soviet Kitsch). There are recorded performances of all of these songs from as early as 2003. Why is this important? Well, because we can criticize the songs in terms of writing or production, but to compare them to her others as "new" and "old" is just wrong.
Where does this all of this lead us? Nowhere. It's art. The elements and execution that should classify it as "good" or "bad" are ultimately irrelevant. The true answer lies in how Regina really feels about it, and how her audience reacts to it. Bullshit aside, does she like the songs she and her producers chose to include? Is she happy with the final product? What would she do differently if she could go back in time and release it again? What's her favorite track? Why?
Maybe equally important: When I listen to it not as a critic but as a fan do I like it? Do you like it? Do any of the songs make us feel anything? Are we glad we bought it or stole it? If we stole it, do we wish we bought it? Will we still go see her live the next time she's in town, knowing half the songs at the show will be from this album?
Yes, probably, yes, yes, yes, and as long as I'm not working that night.